Compiling the example code below yields an example typeset in philosophy.sty. Placing a '%' sign in front of \usepackage{endnotes,philosophy} and a '%' sign in front of \noteshere turns off philosophy.sty and endnotes, which allows you to compile a normal typeset article.
%%LaTeX for Philosophers Example August 27, 2009
%
\documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article} %options: [a4paper, leqno, 11pt]
%\documentclass{amsart}
\usepackage{endnotes,philosophy}
% -----Page Style-------------
\pagestyle{plain}
% -----Symbols----------------
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{graphicx}
% -----Bibliography----------
\usepackage{natbib}
%\bibliographystyle{OUPnum}
\bibliographystyle{apalike}
%\bibliographystyle{plain}
% \citet{Smith:2005} ==> Smith (2005)
% \citep{Smith:2005} ==> (Smith, 2005)
% \citep[see][ ]{Smith:2005} ==> (see Smith, 1990)
% \citeyearpar{Smith:2005} ==> (2005)
\bibpunct{(}{)}{,}{a}{}{,}
% -----Text styles------------
\hyphenation{Bayes-ian}
\hyphenation{Bayes-ian-ism}
%\renewcommand{\labelenumi}{(\alph{enumi})} % enumerate in alpha characters
% -----Environments--------
\newtheorem{proposition}{\textbfb{Proposition}}[section]
\newtheorem{theorem}[proposition]{\textbf{Theorem}}
\newtheorem{lemma}[proposition]{\textbf{Lemma}}
\newtheorem{definition}[proposition]{\textbf{Definition}}
\newtheorem{example}[proposition]{\textbf{Example}}
\newtheorem{corollary}[proposition]{\textbf{Corollary}}
\newtheorem{principle}[proposition]{\textbf{Principle}}
\newtheorem{remark}[proposition]{\textbf{Remark}}
\newtheorem{algorithm}[proposition]{\textbf{Algorithm}}
\newtheorem{observation}[proposition]{\textbf{Observation}}
%%% TITLE %%
\title{\LaTeX \ for Philosophers Example}
\author{Professor You \\ {\small Department of \ldots} \\ {\small University of \ldots}}
\date{}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%% DOCUMENT %%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{document}
%\pagestyle{empty}
\pagestyle{plain}
\maketitle
\thispagestyle{empty}
%\begin{abstract}
%\end{abstract}
%\tableofcontents
\section{}
According to Ramsey \citeyearpar{Ramsey:1929}, you are willing to accept or assert a conditional `If $p$, then $q$' just when, if you were to add $p$ to your store of knowledge, your posterior probability for $q$ would be sufficiently high to warrant you to accept or assert $q$. But Glymour's aliens \citep[194]{Glymour:2007} maintain that\footnote
{See Numlock (1983) for a full account.
} \ldots
\section{}
Foi we a uoisf wlk goda asw qweoij sd aoij as wefoi asd as aoijgf h. Ojka sdf k alkj. Oiafg welk sd woij fd voa wen iuh sdv oik a a iojdf iajsdf as s oiw awoiu a sdfoiu a,
\begin{equation}
f(x) = \frac{A(x + h) - A(x)}{h}.
\end{equation} asdoiul. bhios:
\begin{theorem}
asdf oiu asdf: jp $[\![ A ]\!] \subsetneq [\![ B ]\!]$ rhin $A \prec B$.
\end{theorem}
\noteshere
\begin{thebibliography}{}
\bibitem[Glymour, 2007]{Glymour:2007}
Glymour, C. (2007).
\newblock Bayesian {P}tolemaic psychology.
\newblock In Harper, W. and Wheeler, G., editors, {\em Probability and
Inference: Essays in Honor of {H}enry {E}. {K}yburg, {J}r.}, pages 181--200.
King's College Publications.
\bibitem[Ramsey, 1929]{Ramsey:1929}
Ramsey, F.~P. (1990 (1929)).
\newblock General propositions and causality.
\newblock In Mellor, D.~H., editor, {\em Philosophical Papers}, pages 145--63.
Cambridge University Press.
\end{thebibliography}
%
% end
\end{document}